It is well known that most Indian families buy jewellery in anticipation of their daughter’s wedding. Most jewellery gifting in India is also connected to weddings. It is therefore not surprising that marriages and weddings feature prominently in jewellery advertisements.It is no secret that parents of the bride are happy and apprehensive at the same time. They are in the middle of making perhaps the single biggest spend of their lives. In most cases the bride and groom are strangers, the families don’t know each other well, and parents are hoping their daughter will ‘adjust’ in her new home. Will the married couple get along? Will their daughter be able to pursue a career? There are many uncertainties.
Enter Tanishq. The brand has, in the last quarter-century, always reassured parents. In a situation fraught with risk, at least the jewellery is guaranteed.
Given this background, the recent Ekatvam advertisement is puzzling. Interfaith marriages in India are Uncertainty on steroids. At best, families grudgingly accept the choice made by their offspring, and make the effort to get along. Often, an uneasy compromise entails the breaking off of relations, sometimes repaired with the passage of time and the birth of a grandchild. In a country where inter-caste or same-gotra marriages are, in many cases, seen as justification for honour killing, a Hindu-Muslim wedding may well be the trigger for wider-spread violence. It isn’t right. It isn’t legal. But this is how it is.
So, knowing India’s obsession with finding a suitable boy for their daughter, why should Tanishq lead parents to imagine their daughter marrying outside the religion?
Talking of a suitable boy, Vikram Seth’s magnum opus makes an important distinction. We are uplifted by the reconciliation of Maan Kapoor and Feroze, of Minister Kapoor and the Nawab. We hope for a similar rapprochement in the India of today. But Lata Mehra’s choice of husband is Haresh Khanna, not Kabir Durrani. Another heroine in another book may have made a different choice. But in a book titled ‘A Suitable Boy’, Seth couldn’t have. It was heartbreaking to read in 1993 and it is heartbreaking to watch in 2020. But that is how it is.
The Ekatvam ad set out to show interfaith harmony. It actually showed interfaith matrimony. The two shouldn't be conflated. The first is our pride and joy and the hallmark of our culture, yes hopefully even today. But the second has always been a problematic exception, with questions about conversion and name change and societal acceptance. Do interfaith marriages happen in India? Yes. Do many of them thrive? Yes. Are they inspirational? Yes, for many like me. Are they aspirational? No.
In the larger context, most Indians claim to be inspired by higher ideals. We claim to hope for a day when caste, community, religion or region won’t matter while seeking a matrimonial alliance. But that day isn’t here yet. And it is neither Tanishq’s responsibility, nor remotely within its ability, to march India into that brave new dawn. Tanishq has always been a progressive brand, not an activist one. Rightly so, given the space in which it exists.
An advertisement isn’t just a public service message about Mera Bharat Mahan. While inspiring the audience to higher values, it invites the customer to place herself in the centre of the advertising story and personally experience the emotional payoff. In today’s India, imagining their daughter in the Ekatvam situation is unfortunately a frightening prospect for many parents. With mobs having the run of social media platforms, and perhaps of the high street, a brand with stores having crores worth of inventory in every city becomes a sitting duck with one error of judgment. Tanishq was absolutely right to withdraw the ad, for more reasons than one.









